cat dirt sez "crime pay$"

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Monday, October 19, 2009

How I Lost 20 Pounds (and why this blog ends now...)




    OK so this is my last post ever.  I want to personally thank those of you who reached out in the last month or so via email- both of you.  I can see where some of my posts in the last month seemed a little a maudlin but I was kind of pulling a goth move.  Whatever- I just wanted to personally thank the two of you- your emails were very kind.


    So... last post ever...  Here we go...  If you look at that graph above, it doesn't represent my total weight loss, because I didn't find the graphing program until I had already lost 6 pounds.  In July, 2009, I weighed 201 pounds.  Today I way 181.  How did I do it?  One sentence:


"Burn more calories then you consume."


    What is so complicated about this sentence?  Why do Americans spend billions of dollars on what is termed the "diet industry."  Three reasons:


  1.  People are literally too stupid to figure out the above sentence and how it relates to their lives.
  2.  People are too weak willed to burn more calories then they consume.
  3.  People don't mind being fat.


       In fact, there are thousands of "diet blogs," people journaling about their diet experiences ("I ate a box of Twinkies today- mooaaannn.") or handing out advice.  Now, I'm someone who has successfully achieved my diet goal,  Does this mean I'm going to spend the next five years of my life writing about it everyday?  Telling other people how I did it?  Telling other people how THEY can do it?  Um, no- because that would be pathetic.


         And that is pretty much how I feel about music blogs.  Ideally, music bloggers are people who care more about music then regular folks, they have ideas and opinions about music, they spend a lot of time thinking about music etc. etc. etc.  I guess I'm one of those people, even though I never felt like it.  But why do I need to share those opinions in public, in writing, on a blog?  Isn't that exactly the same as a once fat person, now skinny, who starts a weight loss blog to share his or her insight?  Or is it more like the fat person who can't lose the weight, writing about their struggles.  Music blogging is probably a little bit of both.


         Last month a local journalist wrote me about a post of mine where I'd mentioned his writing.  Here's what he said:


       On the other hand, you’ve clearly put some thought into the validity of writing about music, but don’t seem to be directing the magnifying glass upon yourself when you say things like “There’s nothing in this world that makes me sad like reading people write about music.” You obviously have other obligations, so why do you do it? It’s a double standard. 
    Now, I had already planned all this out before this correspondence, so it's not like it had a direct impact on what I was doing, but, you know, he's correct.  Why do I?  I think the correct answer is... that I should stop doing it (writing about music.)  Whether bloggers want to admit it or not, blogging is an attempt to gain attention from others.  While I don't regret what I wrote in the past, and indeed, am quite happy with what's going on in my life vis a vis music (even though I can't discuss it.) I really can't think of a single reason that I should continue sharing my opinions about anything with the world.  The world doesn't need it, I don't need it.


    Therefore, I am making this conscious decision to still my own voice.  I thank ALL of my readers over the last three years.  Before I shut off my Sitemeter I had more then half a million visits to this blog.  I met a lot of interesting people who probably never would have given me the time of day if it wasn't for this blog. I guarentee all of you that I learned more from writing this blog then anyone learned from reading it.


       My email address for this blog (catdirtecords (@) yahoo (dot) com) will remain active, and in deference to opinion I am going to leave the blog itself up for the time being.  I welcome private correspondence and will continue to participate in local music by attending shows.  


      One final note, I turned the comments back on, because that is part of what this blog was.

   GOODBYE!!!!  Thanks for reading.

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Book Review: The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind by Julian Jaynes

Book Review
The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind
by Julian Jaynes
p. 1978

Julian Jaynes was an obscure, non-tenure academic when he published this book in the late 1970s.  His outlandish thesis was that consciousness was a relatively recent invention, dating basically to the 1000 BCs.  Before then humans were directed by the voices of gods that they heard in their heads.

His argument is well constructed and spectacular in its scope.  Starting in Sumerian Mesopotamia circa 3000 BC he discusses how Kings from that time were always depicted talking directly to their gods.  People of that time had little idols that they kept in their homes (to tell them what to do) and people actually kept their gods in little god houses.  Jaynes theorizes that this voice is something that comes the inactive right side of the brain (language is concentrated in the left part of the brain.)

In the second part of the argument, Jaynes contrasts the Sumerian/Akkadian Mesopotamians to the Assyrians, who showed up circa 2000 BC.  Unlike the Sumerian/Akkadian leaders, who were always shown literally getting their orders from their God, the Assyrian kings were shown talking to empty thrones.  They were also terribly cruel and their letters are full of behavior that prefigures consciousness (plotting, scheming, anxiety.)

During the end of the 2000 BCs there was a several hundred year period of chaos that manifested in the West as the destruction of Mycenean civilization, but had impacts all over the Middle East.  Jaynes theorizes that this chaos resulted in the abandonment of people by their gods.  I.e. they could no longer hear the gods talking to them.  Jaynes is at his weakest when he tries to explain what exactly happened inside the brain during this period.

He speculates that it was the remnans of these bicameral ("god talks to me") people who became "the Hebrews"- based on the fact that the word Hebrew derives from the Akkadian term for "crazy people who wander in the desert."  Thus, in Jaynes thesis, the Bible is the ultimate example of humans evolving consciousness- from "God speaks to us" to "Where has god gone" in one book.  He also talks about the Odyssey vs. the Iliad, and even talks about how modern schizophrenia is a remnant of the bicameral mind.

Can Jaynes "prove" any of it? Not really, not enough evidence.  But I found it pretty convincing.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Tyler Brule is a Personal Hero of Mine

All these posts that I've wanted to do a good job on but oh well, I'd rather have them up.

I've provided a link to his recurring Financial Times column, but he's also the creator/eic of Monocle which is pretty  much a bible for me vis a vis east asian airports and global business trends.  His predecessor at the Financial Times was Nick Denton, who is the creator of the Gawker media empire. I'm not saying I would to do what they did- copying-hello?  But something LIKE what they did.  Tyler Brule's column is amazing. I love it.

Tyler Brule

Mika Miko Quits

Mika Miko will always have a place in my record collection (my wifes record collection, really)  I certainly had a sense this was coming.  I think when I saw them at the Casbah this year and they were still playing the same set from 2 years ago... That is NOT a good sign.  Also I get the sense that all of the women in that band have other stuff going on artsy style and that they didn't really want Mika Miko to go anywhere.  I certainly admire their decision, and look forward to seeing future projects from the band members, whether they be musical or some other type of art.     There is nothing wrong with quitting.  Sometimes you need to get on with your life. Mika Miko RIP.

Demeanor v. Deference in Interpersonal Communication

I'm reading Erving Goffman's "Interaction Rituals" (p. 1967) which is probably as distilled a compilation of wisdom about how to behave as any religious text.  I'm not going to be able to review it, because I won't finish it before the end of the month.  I still wanted to share the distinction Goffman makes between Demeanor and Deference in this book. 

Basically, demeanor is the way you behave: dress, bearing, etc.  Deference is the way you perceive other's behavior towards you.  Your interaction rituals (talking to other people) are guided by both parties expectations/understanding of demeanor and deference. 

This is a concept that makes more intutitve sense to discussions of court protocol in europe in the 18th century, but Goffman convincgly argues that demeanor and deference are the basic analytic concepts of interaction between humans.

I would further say that "style" is a concern with one's "demeanor."   Claims of expertise regarding music or other cultural subjects is an attempt to extract defrence from one's interaction partners.  People who maintain high expectations regarding deference owed to them by others are likely to be troubled by those whose demeanor indicates that they don't intend to properly defer.

What's funny about Goffman's analytical scheme is that it kind of resembles greek philosophical writing on elements of speech, only Goffman is doing it for behavior/conversation.  He kind of describes a basic grammar of interpersonal communication.

The practical benefit to understanding this distinction is that when you have interactions with a person in a superior position of authority, you will be conscious of that person's expectations of YOU, while the conversational partner will be unconscious that you are thinking about him/her way.  This is a distinction that self help books and advisors on interpersonal relationships. (that guy with the hat and guyliner on mtv.)  He like, read this book, and applied it to picking up skanks in bars ("Withdraw now!  Insult her!  Touch her hair!)  All that crap is based on this very neutral analytic scheme.

Show Review: Yo La Tengo @ Soma (Casbah Presents)

Sure, I should have gone to see the Wavves/Soft Pack show, but frankly, the Soft Packs are a bunch of d**** (brian, the drummer, is excepted from that statement.)  And I've seen Wavves play about four times in the last six months, and Yo La Tengo is my wife's fav band ever so...

We started out by hitting Phil's bar b que and Chilis, in that order.  The Sports Arena had some kind of lingerie football event (fact) going on, so it was a colorful crowd.  Phil's barbque is an amazing business- Phil is a small business hero of mine.  I love the crowd at Phil's, particularly the fatties, eating their barbque.  Here's an observation based on my viewing of the National Geographic channel's excellent  "Ardi" documentary:

If you are a human being, and you can't walk, you are in trouble, because the whole point of humanity is that we walk upright.  When you see someone who is too obese to walk, whatever the secondary causes of that condition (not being able to walk) that's a problem, and that human needs to lose some weight.

Chili's is another sports arena favorite.  I love to go there and get the odd drink, but it occurs to me that if I was someone who like, hung out there on a saturday night on the regs, I would probably kill myself.

Then to Soma. Here is the debate my wife and I have about Soma: "well there really isn't another simiarly sized venue in San Diego, so what can you do."
"well, you could blow up soma with dynamite and then bands would just not be able to play there."

It's basically "necessary evil" vs. "abomination on the landscape that needs to be destroyed."  Well, I know the Casbah books shows there, and I know last night's show was a Casbah show, but I am firmly in the "destroy SOMA" camp.  That venue:  the fucking security guards- what a bunch of creepy rapists.  I swear to god the guy who was frisking people at the front door was "joking" with a male patron about sticking his (the door guy) finger up the parton's asshole.  I'm no shrinking violet, but what the fuck creepy bouncer- how many underage girls have you raped, bro?

The whole vibe of SOMA is that no one who works there gives a fuck about the music, something I heard the owner actually SAY at a conference ("Doesn't matter if the band is good as long as they draw.")  Well fine, you do it your way, and I'm never going to SOMA EVER AGAIN EVER.

Soma wrecked Yo La Tengo.  The whole place makes me want to vomit.  It makes me sad that Tim Mays has to put on shows there.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Soft Pack are on 91x This Morning

I was going to make this more mean spirited, but I looked at their loudspeaker playlist (remember that show? loudspeaker? the local show on 91x? Yeah- STILL EXISTS!!!! WOW!!!) and I saw they played a Fifty on Their Heels song.  Sigh. Memories.

Will someone listen to this debacle and tell me how it all works out.  (91x Morning Show Stream)

Things I Won't Get a Chance to Explore: George Herbert Mead


                                       George Herbert Mead

      I've got a stack of amazingly interesting books that I'm not going to be able to finish before 10/31/09...  A couple of observations along those lines: this is this blogs 4000th post.  I can no longer create new labels because blogger limits you to 2000 different labels, and I'm tapped out.

      George Herbert Mead is often called a sociologist, he taught at U of Chicago in the late 19th and 20th century.  To me he's more like a great american philosopher.  Unfortunately he didn't write any self-help style summaries of his thought, so it's scattered over the course of 50 years of writing.  I'm about to tackle "Mind, Self and Society" (Works of George Herbert Mead, Volume 1) (AMAZON)  But I'm not going to get  a chance to review it.  I just wanted this post to remain.  He sounds like an interesting cat.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Put the Casio Down

I'm glad everyone is embracing american indie artists who aren't totally petrified of electronic music, but the combination of this trend and the garage band/home record trend is likely to produce some irritating results over time.

Things I Pre Order: New Tracy Morgan Audio Book


It's the audio version of his new (real) book.  What a great idea!

   Here's an example of something I will pre-order- the new book (audio book version) by Tracy Morgan called "I Am the New Black."  It's basically going to be the most hilarious meta-comedy release ever.  Why is Tracy Morgan a comic god?  How funny is this idea going to be for real?  I am excited to find out!!!!

   Get it- it's the AUDIO book version of his shitty celebrity bio.  That is great.

Blog Archive

Contributors