Dedicated to classics and hits.

Tuesday, May 31, 2022

Collected Criterion Reviews: September 2013

Collected Criterion Reviews: September 2013


Closely Watched Trains (1966) d. Jiří Menzel (9/1/13)

Movie Review
Closely Watched Trains (1966)
 d. Jiří Menzel
Criterion Collection #131

  Closely Watched Trains reminded me of a Truffaut film crossed with an early/mid period Woody Allen film. In other words it is delightful.  Closely Watched Trains takes place in occupied Czech Republic during World War II. Milos Hrma is a sexually frustrated assistant station agent at the local train station.  He is buddies with the wily dispatcher Hubicka, and they are both under the thumb of crotchedy Station Master Lanska.

  Milos begins a relationship with the fetching young Conductor(ess?) Masa, but when he suffers an embarrassing set back in the boudoir he tries to take his own life.  I know, it sounds heavy, but everything is done with a light touch and there is plenty of humor.

  Closely Watched Trains is a testament to the existence of a Czech sense humor, which puts them one up on the Germans.  Does anyone have a recommendation for a German language comedy?  Anyone? No?

Persona (1966) d. Ingmar Bergman (9/3/13)

Bibi Andersson in Persona (1966) d. Ingmar Bergman


Movie Review
Persona (1966)
d. Ingmar Bergman
Criterion Collection #701
Uploaded to Hulu Plus Criterion Collection Channel on August 31st, 2013.
Criterion Collection release March 25th, 2014

ANNOUNCED AS CRITERION COLLECTION TITLE 12/16/13

   So I guess Criterion Collection is sitting on the rights to all these classic movies, because this is yet another film that was just uploaded into the Criterion Collection (onto?) Channel on Hulu Plus last week, but is not a part of the Criterion Collection or a special Eclipse DVD collection. Criterion's penchant for uploading films that are total classics but not part of the Collection itself is really rattling my original mission statement to watch "all the films in the Criterion Collection."  Persona is not in the Criterion Collection but I would feel foolish not writing about it, because Persona is maybe Bergman's best film... certainly the director's own favorite, and a movie that I found deeply compelling.

  The Ellis History of Film text book has this to say about Bergman, "As a film artist Begman tends to appeal most directly and strongly to those who aren't interested primarily in film art but regard film from the vantage point of the other arts, especially literature and drama."

  The plot of Persona is sparse: Liv Ullmann is a famous Actress who is struck dumb during a performance, and refuses to speak thereafter.  Bibi Andersson is the nurse assigned to take care of her at the beach house of Ullmann's treating physician.  While at the beach house, Andersson takes Ullmann into her confidence, only to feel betrayed when she reads a letter written by Ullmann to her Doctor describing Andersson as a specimen worthy of study.  Afterwards, the idyllic retreat turns into a twisted psychological torture session as Andersson seeks revenge.  Also she bangs Ullmann's husband.

  The most common interpretation of Persona is that it is a kind of Modernist horror film where the monster is the protagonist.  That is how I took Persona- both the first time I saw it and then this time.  In his book Images, Bergman wrote that Persona and Cries and Whispers were his two favorite works.  I also think they are the two best of his movies.  Really haunting and sticky resonating imagery.


The Vanishing (1988) d. George Sluizer (9/4/13)

Raymond Lemorne as played by Bernard-Pierre Donnadieu

Movie Review
The Vanishing (1988)
d. George Sluizer
Spine #133


   There is nothing as sweet as a one hit wonder.  To think that an Artist could labor lifetime in their chosen field or fields and have their memory reduced to a single work in the collective consciousness of posterity.  And yet, most Artists never even have that one "hit," so cruel is the marketplace for art products and so short is the memory of critics and scholars.  The Vanishing is the one hit for director George Sluzier.  He had an entire career, with films made in Europe and America, but this is his legacy.

  The Vanishing is maybe not the scariest movie in the world, but it is among the creepiest.  The description typically is "Obsessed man searches for wife who disappears from French rest stop."  But the film itself depicts the viewpoint of the distraught husbands AND the kidnapper.  Thus, it is quite clear almost from the jump who the kidnapper is.  Instead, the focus of the film turns towards the inevitable meet up between kidnapper and husband.

  The kidnapper is memorably played as a straight bourgeois sociopath by Bernard-Pierre Donnadieu- his sly mannerisms and quiet self confidence inspired a chill in me as I recalled clients who had shared similar characteristics.  It's hard to understand how I could have missed this film before now.  So glad I got to see it, and you should to. DO NOT watch the American remake because it fucking sucks- they change the ending from sad to happy which is just monstrous.


Boy (1969) d.  Nagisa Oshima (9/6/13)

Movie Review
Boy (1969)
d.  Nagisa Oshima
Streaming on Hulu Plus in Criterion Collection section, not Criterion Collection or Eclipse title.
(Not Available on Amazon)

  Boy directed by Japanese maverick Nagisa Oshima, went up on Hulu Plus streaming last week in the Criterion Collection section.  It's not actually a Criterion Collection release, nor is it part of an Eclipse DVD set.  But it is a classic Japanese film by the most interesting Japanese director I've seen beside Seijun Suzuki.  It's akin to a 60s Gus Van Sant film, focusing on a nuclear family of con artists who work there way from city to city pulling fake car accident scams.

 The Ellis History of Film has high praise for Oshima which I would echo, "Using narrative structures and techniques reminiscent of the French Jean-Luc Godard, Oshima is yet profoundly Japanese in his sensibility."  Boy was the most watchable Japanese film I've yet seen- it was like seeing a parallel universe of indie film making.  Oshima uses all the Godardian tricks, but he tells a compelling, tragic story rooted in human emotion and ideas about family.

  It was previously unavailable on streaming or DVD I believe (based on its absence on Amazon.com) so this is a big score for Criterion Collection on Hulu Plus, and hopefully it signifies a proper Criterion Collection release.  Oshima has some legitimate Criterion Collection/Hulu Plus hits.  In the Realm of the Senses is the number one popular streaming title within the collection (because it has sex in it?) and Double Suicide has a really low Spine number.  And there are six others- but Boy is new.

The Ruling Class (1972) d. Peter Medak (9/6/13)

Movie Review
The Ruling Class (1972)
 d. Peter Medak
Criterion Collection #132

  The Ruling Class is so strange that it is hard to even describe properly.  It's clearly "from the 70s," it's British... Peter O'Toole plays the main character, there are elements of both musicals and horror films but the objective of The Ruling Class is clearly satirizing the landed aristocracy of England circa the late 1960s early 1970s.  So.... if you go in for 70s era class conscious satire with elements of music and horror The Ruling Class will almost certainly appeal to you.

 On the other hand, if you are a normal American who doesn't give a f*** about the UK let alone the UK in the 1970s,  The Ruling Class will leave you scratching your head.  The strange mix of elements reminds me of little else besides the Rocky Horror Picture Show.  The accompanying Criterion Collection write up is correct in calling Peter O'Toole's performance a :"tour de force."

  I gather from Ian Christie's article on The Ruling Class found on the Criterion Collection website that there is a whole bunch of stuff going on inside of The Ruling Class that I just don't have the background to appreciate.  My knowledge of 70s British culture is limited to the "rise of punk," "Monty Python," and sociologists of the Birmingham school and their pioneering studies of youth sub-cultures. (1)

   The Christie article references the "theatricality" of The Ruling Class and I can see that.  You could also call it "campy."   Either way it is a particular stylistic chracteristic of The Ruling Class that is kind of make or break in terms of a subjective appreciation of the film.  In other words, you either love it or hate it.


NOTES

(1)  I don't think I've ever referenced the Birmingham School but when I was in college I did a thesis on punk/straight edge culture and I think a lot of that stuff really seeped into my brain:

Birmingham School refers to the work of the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS), which operated as a research center at the University of Birmingham (UK) between 1964 and 1988. The Birmingham School represents a decisive moment in the creation of the intellectual and institutional project of cultural studies, as well as a “cultural turn” in sociology. The substantive focus of the Birmingham School was popular culture as explored through the concepts of ideology and hegemony. Indeed, the work of CCCS contributed to the legitimization of popular culture as a field of academic inquiry. Among the substantive topics of research undertaken by CCCS were the mass media, youth subcultures, education, gender, race, and the authoritarian state. The media were of special significance insofar as the texts of popular culture in the contemporary world are forged within their framework. CCCS was founded in 1964 as a postgraduate center by Richard Hoggart and developed further under the leadership of Stuart Hall. It is during the period of Hall's directorship (1968–79) that one can first speak of the formation of an identifiable and distinct domain called cultural studies.

A Man Escaped (1956) d. Robert Bresson (9/7/13)

Movie Review
A Man Escaped (1956)
 d. Robert Bresson
Criterion Collection #650
Criterion Collection edition released March 26th, 2013

  Man it has been a boundary blurring few days in terms of this Criterion Collection project, what with the Criterion Collection uploading all these non-Collection titles to the Hulu Plus channel.  I even found one film, the recently released Hitler comedy To Be Or Not To Be, that is uploaded to Hulu Plus but not listed as such on the website, a kind of hidden new release.  The labyrinth gets deeper and deeper.   I don't want to even talk about the fact that they seem to have uploaded all 26 "Zatochi the Blind Swordsman" films at once.  I get anxious just thinking about the prospect of watching those Zatochi films.

  I also think it is the proper time to abandon the conceit that I'm only watching three films a week.  Who am I kidding with that?  Summer is over anyways, so it's not like I have some need to pretend that I'm out on vacation enjoying myself somewhere, as was the case for the last eight August's in a row.  Let's get real.

  Robert Bresson is interesting because he is the French filmmaker that Truffaut first cited in support of his theory of Auteur cinema.  A Man Escaped (1956) was based on a real incident involving the imprisonment of a member of the resistance and his escape from a Gestapo prison in the France of 1943.  the film is only indirectly about the war and occupation, however; directly, as with so many of Bresson's films, it is about a human being in isolation, physical as well as spiritual in this case.  The inner experience of the protagonist is refined to a pure, concentrated, intense expression. (1)

   A Man Escaped is actually the first of the six Bresson films within the Criterion Collection.  I enjoyed the solid rigor of the prison escape plot.  Throughout the entire film you do not see a single thing that the characters do not, giving A Man Escaped a near theatrical feel.  This is good for developing narrative tension, but bad in terms of mise  en scene and just general watchability.

Notes

(1)  This paragraph is a paraphrase/citation from Ellis History of Film, page 297.

High and Low (1963) d. Akira Kurosawa (9/9/13)


Toshiro Mifune as wealthy women's shoe manufacturer Kingo Gondo in Akira Kurosawa's High and Low (1963)

Movie Review
High and Low (1963)
 d. Akira Kurosawa
Criterion Collection #24

  High and Low is Kurosawa's take on the police procedural, with source material from Ed McBain's King's Ransom novel from his "19th Precinct" series.  You can tell the difference between a police procedural and a film noir often because the police procedural deals with actual police doing actual police work to solve an actual crime, and film noir typically features private detectives sorta kinda trying to figure out a situation where a crime may or not have actually been committed OR accused of committing a crime themselves.


  But of course, like everything Kurosawa did from the early 1950s to mid 1960s it was a fucking classic of the genre.  It's the first non-Samurai Kurosawa picture I've seen.  Based on his imdb filmography it looks like he did a bunch of non Samurai titles before he really started churning out the hits.  There are many features that make High and Low a compulsively watchable title:

 1. Directed by Akira Kurosawa
 2.  Starring Toshiro Mifune as wealthy Industrialist and women's shoe manufacturer(!) Kingo Gordo (that's Mr. Gordo to you, friend.)
3.  Set in contemporary Yokohama- exotic locale for a Japanese film.
4.  Adorably police work by 50s Japanese Cops, who apparently have so little to do that they can muster the entire police force to work on a single kidnapping case.


  As a bonus, the Hulu Plus version includes an actual extra from the DVD- an interview with Actor Tsutomu Yamazaki (plays the kidnapper/villain).  I know I've said this before, but I'm very hesitant to take the current heaven-sent situation with Crtierion Collection/Hulu Plus for granted.  As I write this Hulu is taking offers on being SOLD.  This New York Times article from last month clearly suggests that the current way of Hulu is at risk, and Criterion Collection already left one streaming provider (Netflix) because it was unhappy with the direction of the service.

 My feeling is that the Criterion Collection could disappear from Hulu overnight, essentially, if certain events occur, like if Hulu is sold to a major media conglomerate, for example.  So while these review may seem a trifle obsessive, they are completed with the thought that nothing lasts forever.

  Subtracting the films out of the first 25 Criterion Collection titles that I've seen before beginning this project, there are only two unseen titles left- A Night To Remember- which I'm going to have to pay for, and Salo/120 Days of Sodom, which I'm going to have to purchase or borrow.

  I'm not recommending it, but if you were going to sample one twenty minute portion of High and Low I would check out the last 20 minutes- particularly the scenes set in the 60s heroin underworld of Yokohama- priceless/amazing stuff.

To Be or Not to Be (1942) d. Ernest Lubitsch (9/9/13)

Carole Lombard- To be or Not to Be was her last film.

Movie Review
To Be Or Not To Be (1942)
 d. Ernest Lubitsch
Criterion Collection #670
Criterion Collection edition released on August 27th, 2013

  Here is another strange title- not listed as being available on Hulu Plus on the Criterion Collection product page, but none the less available for viewing the same day (if not before?) the new release. To Be Or Not To Be is not listed in the recently added tab when you navigate the Criterion Collection on Hulu Plus, so I don't know if it has been up for a long time or if it just hasn't been featured as a recent addition yet.  It's actually a been a couple days since they've uploaded a new title, perhaps because this marks of the end of their 101 Days of Summer promotion where they uploaded a new title every day for 101 days.

  To Boe Or Not To Be is what you call a "Hitler comedy" a group of perhaps four or five films (maybe six if you count Downfall as a comedy;) that deal with Hitler as a comic figure.  You've got the Great Dictator, of course. The Producers.  And, To Be Or Not To Be, which falls under the category of "too soon."  Directed by the long tenured German filmmaker Ernest Lubitsch, To Be Or Not To Be starred Jack Benny and Carole Lombard as actors who are also members of the Polish resistance.

  They get involved in a "screw ball comedy" style plot that features much innuendo, costume changes and displays of verbal wit by Jack Benny.  Like many Criterion Collection titles, To Be Or Not To Be is both better and worse then it sounds.  To Be Or Not To Be is better then it sounds because the direction and performances are first rate.  To Be or Not to Be is worse then it sounds because Hitler does not really go well with the screwball comedy genre- he's more of a subject for satire (see The Great Dictator.) 

Rashomon (1950) d. Akira Kurosawa (9/11/22)

Movie Review
Rashomon (1950)
 d. Akira Kurosawa
Criterion Collection #138

   With 26 films included, Akira Kurosawa, by himself, makes up close to 5% of the entire Criterion Collection (3.8 percent.)  So what I want to know is that when the Criterion Collection writes that Kurosawa is "arguably the most celebrated Japanese  film maker of all time." Who are the competitors that they are thinking about?  Suzuki? Ozu? Inagaki?  I would say that any "argument" on the subject of "Who is the most celebrated Japanese film maker of all time?" would last about as long as it would take all the participants to say "Kurosawa!" at the exact same time.

  Unfortunately I'm not a huge fan so watching all these Kurosawa movies is a bit of an endurance test.  At least Rashomon clocks in at less then two hours.  Criterion Collection saw fit to upload the Robert Altman interview that serves as the introduction on the DVD, and I found his opinion most useful.  Altman notes that in Rashomon, Kurosawa was the first director to shoot the sun/sky- a technique Altman himself immediately utilized in his own work after seeing Rashomon for the first time.

 Rashomon is most well known for the unusual narrative technique: telling the same story from the perspective of four different witnesses.  The only thing they agree on is the central fact of the film: the death of "the man" Masayuki Mori after the bandit (Toshiro Mifune in not one of his greatest performances) rapes his wife Machiko Kyo.  Each witness, including the dead man via a medium, tells a different version of the same events.

  This narrative form was impressive in 1950, and it continues to impress today.  After watching Rashomon I went to a movie theater and watched the new Wolverine film, and it was like going from a museum where you see a master piece to a Thomas Keller, painter of light, kiosk at the mall.  They are both paintings, but one is art and the other mere commerce.   I mention Wolverine because that film is set entirely in Japan, so one might at least expect some referencing to the Japanese film tradition.   If they did- I didn't catch it- Wolverine might as well have been set in the Japanese Tea Garden in San Francisco for all the location mattered.

The Last Wave (1977) d. Peter Weir (9/13/13)

Movie Review
The Last Wave (1977)
d. Peter Weir
Criterion Collection #142

  Boasting both a killer 80s synth sound track and an engaging plot concerning the efforts by an Australian lawyer (Richard Chamberlin) to defend a group of urban Aborigines accused of manslaughtering one of their own, The Last Wave shouldn't require much a pitch to watch in that it is a) not a silent film b) not a black and white film c) is in English and d) has a conventional criminal trial plot crossed with a supernatural/aboriginal hook to keep things interesting.

  This is the second Australian Criterion Collection title I've encountered- the other is Walkabout- and I've previously seen though not written about Picnic At Hanging Rock- which is also by Peter Weir, the director of the Last Wave.  Walkabout is directed by Nicholas Roeg.   Picnic at Hanging Rock was released in 1975 and catapulted Weir to international prominence, and so The Last Wave has the feel of a  film that was meant to reach the widest possible audience for a film with Australian themes.

  The sound track is particularly notable for the synth heavy vibe.  The Last Wave is no chore to watch and it makes an enjoyable evening view.

Grand Illusion (1937) d. Jean Renoir (9/14/13)

Erich von Stroheim as Captain von Stroheim faces off with his friend/nemesis Captain de Boldieu (played by Pierre Fresnay.)

Movie Review
Grand Illusion (1937)
d. Jean Renoir
Criterion Collection #1

 In Los Angeles for the weekend, as I often am these days, plotting my escape from the disaster of my San Diego based social life, I have access to my friends Criterion DVD collection, which includes Criterion Collection #1, Jean Renoir's masterpiece Grand Illusion.  I've seen Grand Illusion at least twice, but never had access to the Criterion Collection edition, so I wanted to give it a spin.

 Because I've seen Grand Illusion multiple times, I had no compunction about watching it with the audio commentary track turned on.  Here, the excellent commentary is provided by film historian Peter Cowie.  Perhaps it is because the film itself is so interesting, but I found Cowie's commentary particularly illuminating, especially his comments about famous Director/Actor/Enfant Terrible Erich von Stroheim, who plays the indelible Captain von Rauffenstein.  It is impossible to forget Stroheim's performance, and his performance is even more remarkable that it happened almost two decades after he was cast out of Hollywood for turning in seven and a half hour epic films (the original cut of Greed was seven hours plus) in complete opposition to what was becoming the Hollywood recipe for a feature film.

  Grand Illusion is a prison escape movie, set during World War I, but released on the eve of World War II.  Renoir's vision has a warmth that put him out of favor in the era of the Nouvelle Vague/New Wave, but his mastery of the art form, which Cowie points out in intimate detail, eliminates any kind of serious crticism about the "softness" of Grand Illusion.

  Renoir was a master craftsman but his artistic vision sought to unify, not divide.  It was this trait which put him out of favor with the literati in the 60s and 70s, but when Criterion Collection picks your movie as their number one title, it means you are all the way back and watching Grand Illusion for the first or tenth time it is easy to see why he is regarded as a master by 

The Ballad of Narayama (1952) d. Keisuke Kinoshita (9/14/13)

The Ballad of Narayama: Fun little movie about abandoning your Mom to be eaten by crows on a mountain top.

Movie Review
The Ballad of Narayama (1958)
d. Keisuke Kinoshita
Criterion Collection #645

  Fun little picture about the ancient Japanese practice of abandoning one's elderly parents to die in the wilderness, The Ballad of Narayama is known equally for its distinctive visual presentation, influenced directly by the conventions of Japanese theater, and its utterly depressing subject matter.  When you combine the subject matter with the pan-Japanese cinema tradition of holding shots for minutes at a time, you get a movie that feels much, much, much longer then the 90 minute run time would leave you to believe.

 The Ballad of Narayama is shot entirely on sound stages, with a breathtaking use of lighting and color to create a visual atmosphere that would feel contemporary today.  On the other hand, nothing could be LESS contemporary then the subject matter. I don't shy away from dark films, but watching a 90 minute picture about a family making a conscious decision to abandon their elderly mother to be eaten by birds takes you to a really, really, really dark place, and I'm not sure why anyone would really want to watch this movie.

Salò or The 120 Days of Sodom (1975) d.  Pier Paolo Pasolini (9/15/13)

Salò or The 120 Days of Sodom (1975)
d.  Pier Paolo Pasolini
Criterion Collection #17

  Movies don't get edgier then this. Pier Paolo Pasolini's version of Marquis de Sade 120 Days of Sodom is a tough watch, though if you are familiar with the book you can imagine myriad ways it could have been worse.  The "plot" of 120 Days of Sodom is minimal in the book:  A group of four decadent/depraved Libertines kidnaps a host of young boys and girls and wall themselves up with four elderly courtesans, some large dicked enforcers, and their own daughters who they marry as "wives."

"Nothing's more contagious than evil." -a still from Salo or the 120 Days of  Sodom by Pier Paolo Pasolini


  During the day the courtesans tell erotic stories from their lives, and the libertines inflict all manner of humiliation and degradation on their captives, giving birth in the book to what we today call "Sado Masochism,"  or the infliction of physical and mental anguish in the service of sexual gratification.  As the book makes perfectly clear, time and time again, 120 Days of Sodom is a critique of the totality of the enlightenment/rational world view, and it firmly makes the case that enlightenment itself is a sham and has terrible, anarchic implications.  Over three centuries later, De Sade couldn't have been more right, and the evidence of the validity of his critique is supported by a hundred years of Continental philosophers (Foucault, Nietzsche, Adorno, etc.)

  Pasolini similarly made the movie version as a protest against the consumer-fascist culture that he hated and it is his disgust for consumerist society that permeates Salo.  Pasolini set his version in 1944, in the Northern Italian Fascist puppet state centered on the city of Salo.  During the film you can hear the Allied bombers putting a slow but decisive end to their world, but that is the only intrusion of the outside world into the narrative.

 Although the subject matter is "pornographic" Pasolini uses theatrically inspired distancing techniques to drain any kind of eroticism from the film.  As Catherine Breilliat argues in one of the three accompanying documentaries, Salo is actually an anti-pornographic film in that it employs the opposite visual technique of most pornography:  Rather then excluding context to focus on sex organs and sexual pleasure, Pasolini always shoots sexually themed material with long shots and a steady camera, forcing the context onto the viewer.

  Salo is one of several Italian films of the 70s- another is The Night Porter, that sought to re-contextualize the asethetics and themes of Nazism/Fascism.  I believe the point of this critique was to emphasis that Naszism/Fascism was not some kind of aberrant behavior but rather a culmination of intellectual themes that were developed in the so-called Enlightenment, and that the mid 20th century success of Fascism/Nazi ideology points to the failure of that Enlightenment, and is evidence in support of the claim that modernity is a failed project.
   
The Cranes Are Flying (1957) d. Mikhail Kalatozov (9/16/13)

Movie Review
The Cranes Are Flying (1957)
d. Mikhail Kalatozov
Criterion Collection #146

 Is there some alternate universe where a substantial number of people give a fuck about Russian film from the 1950s?  I've never met a single person who could kick knowledge about Russian cinema outside of Eisenstein, and that knowledge is typically limited to his silent work.  I don't ever remember seeing a vintage Russian film screening at repertory theater in any of the cities I've lived in.  The Cranes Are Flying is the first classic of the post-Stalinist era, when the Soviet Union briefly relaxed for just a god damn second and let Artists experiment with themes that would have been samzidat under the prior regime.

  The Cranes Are Flying was instantly recognized as having classic status and being the start of a new era in Soviet film.  It won the Palme d'Or at the 1958 Cannes Film Festival, for one.  It's also very watchable- clocking in at just over an hour and a half, with a war time setting that gives you some action with the melodramatic plot concerning separated lovers Veronika and Boris.  Spoiler alert: It ends tragically.

  The most stand out qualitiy of The Cranes Are Flying is the cinematography by Sergei Urusevsky.  Urusevsky creates drama and rhythm by his progressive use of hand held cameras- this in the early 1950s that he's doing this.  There are several moments of genuine emotional impact that are profoundly heightened by the editing.  Second to the cinematography is the performance of Tatyana Samojlova as Veronika.  Her unconventional (by Hollywood standards) beauty really draws the eye of the viewer.

  The plot is conventional melodrama: couple separated by war; will they find their way back together?  I'm not spoiling anything by saying they do not- you find less then halfway through the film that he is dead and after that it's just basically an exercise in torturing his unfaithful girlfriend- Veronika- who has hooked up with Boris' cousin, the rascally Mark.   The Cranes Are Flying is another legit Criterion Collection win- A movie you've probably never heard of before, which holds the eye and isn't overlong.

Chronicle of a Summer (1961) d.  Jean Rouch and Edgar Morin (9/16/13)

Chronicle of a Summer

Movie Review
Chronicle of a Summer (1961)
d.  Jean Rouch and Edgar Morin
Criterion Collection #648

 OK so this is a "cinema verite" film that features interviews with a variety of people in Paris and I think St. Tropez as well.  The handheld camera was introduced to the market while this film was being made, and the use of hand held cameras in Chronicle of a Summer would prove to be a turning point in the development of the film documentary.  I wasn't expecting Chronicle of a Summer to be particularly watchable, but I was pleasantly surprised at how interesting the slice-of-life conversations were.  In particular there are conversations about race and the holocaust held between a young, Jewish French concentration survivor, two African-French immigrants and some young French men and women that I found particularly compelling.

  More then just a museum piece, Chronicle of a Summer is a must for anyone interested in the documentary as a separate art form from the narrative film, for people interested in the French new wave and a "pass" for everyone else.  For anyone interested, the essay featured on the Criterion Collection product page is a must: One of the more thorough and in depth accompanying essays I've read and that is really saying something because all the essays on the Criterion Collection site are superb. 

House (1977) d. Nobuhiko Obayashi (9/19/13)

Just one of about of a million WTF moments in House (1977) d. Nobuhiko Obayashi



House (1977)
 d. Nobuhiko Obayashi
Criterion Collection #539

Obayashi creates visual effects by actually including art onto the frame to give it a real DIY/cut out feel.


  I've been reflecting that watching Criterion Collection titles is a good way to seek inspiration. There is a hugely liberating, soul-freeing feeling that stems from having the entire history of world cinema at your finger tips for 7.99 a month. I can't help but wonder about the viewer statistics per movie- what I wouldn't give to know how many watchers a day the most popular title garners.

Auntie eating an EYEBALL- NBD.


  House is, as the Criterion Collection itself says, a landmark in the Cinema du WTF?, a totally left-field blend of Japanese B Movie budget, school girls in distress, Japanese folk horror, 70s Italian Horror and American grindhouse, with psychedelic visual effects, a demonic cat and cannibalism all thrown into the mix.  And if that description doesn't make you immediately want to watch House I will conclude this write-up with a serious of still photographs from the film.  House is a Criterion Collection MUST-watch.  100% Watch-ability score.

This is actually a gif derived from the film itself- her face does look like that in the movie.

Juliet of the Spirits (1965) d. Federico Fellini (9/20/13)

Movie Review
Juliet of the Spirits (1965)
d. Federico Fellini
Criterion Collection #149

   Been reading other blogs that serially review Criterion Collection titles and trying to understand why they are all so boring.  Something I've noticed is that they tend to be lengthy over all, contain lengthy plot summations and lots of film studies type observations.  If there is one thing I've learned about trying to blog about serious/academic subjects is that people do not a give a fuck and even devoted readers will give you about half a page before they move on.  Unless you are like the New York Times, but I bet even they see incredible drop off for lengthy magazine features in terms of page views.

  If you write it up in a way that duplicates what is already out there, it's stupid, because if people want to know the plot or themes of Juliet of the Spirits they can Google it and read the Wikipedia page.  I think the answer is to make it personal- I think the most successful writers on the web are people who can bring people in to their inner life- and  to never assume that people have a background in what you are talking about. In fact, the opposite.

  Never considered myself a fan of Fellini.  He's got nine titles in the Criterion Collection, but at least three of them aren't available for streaming.  I'm sure I suffered through Nights of Cabiria at some point.  I've never actually met anyone who said they've watched and enjoyed Fellini's films- but if I did I would look at them at sceptically and say, "Really- have you actually watched a Fellini film, or are you just saying that because you've heard him described as "surreal" and you think liking him is cool?"  Because I really have not enjoyed Amarcord or Julie of the Spirits.  I mean, I get it- I guess- and I can understand why he was such a revelation in the 60s, but I feel like the movies have aged badly.  I probably need to just talk to a fan for fifteen minutes at a party.

  Juliet of the Spirits is yet another movie about a failed marriage.  Here, it's the powerless wife and the flagrantly philandering husband.  Forgive me, but I thought that behavior was entirely acceptable in Italy, particularly when the husband was the bread winner and the wife had no children and didn't work.  Juliet is played by Fellini's actual wife, and the story is that this is a movie about their actual marriage, and when Gulieta Masina would ask how to play a certain part or line he would just shout out "Just play yourself."

  Oh Fellini!  I guess the real story is that Fellini had a ton of gay lovers, which of course does not make it into the Fellini resembling husband, who is here a fashion show promoter of some sort.  The usual cast of freaks and characters that gave rise to the phrase "Fellini-esque" are on hand, of course, and Juliet of the Spirits is the first picture where Fellini used color film, so it has that going for it.

 But it's hard not to kind of feel sorry for the wife.  There is some insight here I suppose, but mostly she just seems confused and bewildered for the entire run time.  I guess that's kind of the point, but it makes her look kind of of bad.

Stromboli (1950) d. Roberto Rossellini (9/23/13)

Movie Review
Stromboli (1950)
 d. Roberto Rossellini
Criterion Collection #673
Criterion Collection Release Date: September 24th, 2013
Part of  3 Films By Roberto Rossellini Starring Ingrid Bergman

  Roberto Rossellini is probably the third most famous Italian film director behind Federico Fellini and Michelangelo Antonioni, but he is the number one representative of Italy in terms of films in the Criterion Collection: he has 12, vs. Fellini with 9 and Antonioni with 6.  Rossellini is typically credited with being the originator of "Italian Neo-Realism," a style of cinema which preceded the French New Wave but shares aspects of that movement in terms of being a post-World War II reaction to pre World War II trends in Cinema.

 Stromboli was his first film with then Hollywood star Ingrid Bergman.  Of course, Bergman had cemented her role as a Hollywood icon/A lister with her performance opposite Humphrey Bogart in Casablanca (1942).  The story goes that Bergman wrote Rossellini suggesting that they make a movie or two together, Rossellini, presumably not a moron said, "OK."   They subsequently had an affair and that affair produced twins (Isabella Rossellini is one).  Bergman was ostracized from Hollywood for a decade afterward- like she gave a fuck- although maybe it was hard for her to abandon her husband and child(!) which she did.

  Considering the existential/bleak tone of Stromboli, the story of a Lithuanian national stranded in a Post War Italian Refugee camp (Bergman) who agrees to marry an Italian fisherman out of desperation, only to find herself marooned on his desolate, volcanic, hell-hole of a home island, the viewer has plenty of time to reflect on the ample back story between Rossellini and Bergman.  Indeed, it is not so hard to actually search for the back story on the web while the movie is playing because there is so little happening on screen.

  Basically, Bergman is sad that she is on the island, for 90 minutes.  It's hard to compare Stromboli to Antonioni's L'Avventura.  L'Avventura has a different story, but the similarities between the volcanic type island that figure prominently in both films is hard to ignore. 

Idi Amin Dada: A Self Portrait (1974) d. Barbet Schroeder (9/25/13)

Movie Review
Idi Amin Dada: A Self Portrait (1974)
 d. Barbet Schroeder
Criterion Collection #153

  Idi Amin Dada: A Self Portrait plays better as a farce then an expose.  The story of the making of Idi Amin is probably better known then the content of the film itself.  French director Schroeder (who would become well known in the US a decade plus later for Reversal of Fortune) was invited by Amin himself to come to Uganda and shoot a documentary.  One imagines that he had something like The Triumph of the Will in mind.but that is not what he got.  Instead, Schroeder created a fairly straight forward documentary that largely consists of Amin talking at the camera.  In terms of impact Amin comes off more like a parody of a genocidal tyrant then and actual tyrant, although the comic element is undercut by Schroeder's off screen commentary.

 In one particularly intriguing seen, Amin lectures his assembled cabinet and singles out the foreign minister for criticism.  While you are listening it's hard to take Amin seriously- he sounds like a pompous high school teacher, but then Schroeder tells you that said foreign minister was found shot to death in the Nile river a month later and suddenly Amin looks terrifying.

  Idi Amin Dada is filled with such queasy/funny moments. It is hard to really find comedy in someone so obviously psychotic and when you add in his penchant for extra judicial murder it can be at times hard to watch.  But it is, I think, the definitive film on the phenomenon of the 20th century
 African Strong Man dictator, and will be watched forever for that reason.


Journey to Italy/Voyage to Italy (1954)  d. Roberto Rossellini (9/25/13)

Journey to Italy/Voyage to Italy (1954)
d. Roberto Rossellini
Criterion Collection #675
Part of 3 Films by Roberto Rossellini Starring Ingrid Bergman
Criterion Collection edition released September 24th 2013.

Yet another fun Italian movie about a disintegrating marriage.  Here, Ingrid Bergman plays Katherine, married to Alex (George Sanders).  They are an English couple visiting the Naples area to sell a villa left to them by an eccentric uncle.  While there, their marriage frays to the breaking point, only to be resolved in the last 60 seconds of the film in what feels like a cheap, tacked on happy ending.

Both Stomboli! and Journey to Italy/Voyage to Italy have endings that put a happy spin on two 90 minute journeys of personal anguish.  Ingrid Bergman cracks exactly two smiles within both films.  Both times, the smiles are for men other then her husband and lead to further arguments and disagreements between her character and her husband.

 The real star of Journey to Italy/Voyage to Italy is Naples.  The husband and wife spend most of the movie apart, she going to museums and various archaeological sites, he running off to Naples and consorting (but not consummating) with the prostituti. The tone of Journey to Italy/Voyage to Italy is set when Bergman announces to her husband that after nine years of marriage, she feels like they are perfect strangers.

 Growing up, you always heard about the seven year itch, but as someone whose own marriage broke up after nine years I have to say that seems to be more accurate.  Anna Karenina's marriage lasted nine years, this one- there are others.  Something about the nine year mark.  I guess that's enough time to know that you are fooling yourself.

  While Journey to Italy/Voyage to Italy is interesting enough, I would be hard pressed to recommend it to anyone besides Italian Neo-Realist die hards and fans of films about failing marriages.  I'm one but not the other.  The Italian neo-realists are my second least favorite Criterion Collection genre behind "every movie from Japan."  Luckily the third film in this Rossellini collection is NOT available on Hulu Plus so I'm all done for now.

Summer Interlude (1951) d. Ingmar Bergman (9/25/13)


Maj-Britt Nilsson plays Marie in Summer Interlude (1951) d. Ingmar Bergman

Movie Review
Summer Interlude (1951)
d. Ingmar Bergman
Criterion Collection #613

  Part of the point of this endeavor (watching all of the Criterion Collection titles) is to learn more about my own taste for films.  One of the early discoveries thus far is that I really like Ingmar Bergman.  The film text book I bought, itself from the 60s, derides Bergman claiming that his fans are typically people who view film as a form of literature, but if viewing film as a form of literature is wrong then baby I don't want to be right.

 I love the heroines of Bergman- dark, steeped in regret and repressed longing, I feel like I identify with them and their experiences.  Bergman's films are steeped in fatalism/existentialism/ Protestantism, gloomy and severe they represent a body of work that comes close to approximating the real emotional experience of many people who love and lose, people who are isolated from their surroundings, people who live in the past.  His culture is so far from what we call "contemporary pop culture" that he might as well be a 19th century novelist, and yet all of his films maintain a relevance simply by virtue of their emotional acuity.

 Summer Interlude is about a summer affair between two young people that ends with the death of the boy, Henrik.  Marie, the female half of the pair (played by a winning Maj-Britt Nilsson) is a ballerina who tells the story from the present in flashback forms.  The happiness of the past is contrasted with the gloominess of the present, where Marie is "always tired" and wonders what the point is of all of it.

  Bergman successfully counterpoints the beauty of the Nordic summer with the reality of a present where Marie is trapped inside the ballet theater for days on end, rehearsing for a big performance but realizing she is nearing the end of her professional career as a ballerina.  I agree with the Criterion Collection synopsis entirely:
Touching on many of the themes that would define the rest of his legendary career—isolation, performance, the inescapability of the past—Ingmar Bergman’s tenth film was a gentle drift toward true mastery.
  Everyone should watch Bergman movies, particularly those struggling with isolation and/or the inescapability of the past.  Don't we all do that?

The Gold Rush (1942) d. Charlie Chaplin (9/27/13)

Charlie Chaplin performs the "dance of the rolls" scene from The Gold Rush, among the most iconic single scenes in cinema history.

Movie Review
The Gold Rush (1942)
 d. Charlie Chaplin

  Originally shown as a silent film upon release in 1925, Chaplin himself added narration (spoken by Chaplin) and music to a 1942 re-issue that the Criterion Collection bills as the "definitive" edition.  To me, that is a little like calling the CGI enhanced versions of Star Wars that George Lucas put out last decade as being the "definitive" version of those titles.  Or like calling the colorized version of a black and white film the "definitive" version of that title.

  I guess at a certain level the Criterion Collection is about marketing, and considering that it is Chaplin himself who wrote AND spoke the narration AND picked the music AND he wrote AND directed the 1925 version, he can do whatever the eff he wants to The Gold Rush.

 The Gold Rush was an international hit for Chaplin and the so-called "Dance of Rolls" scene, which younger people might have only seen reenacted by Johnny Depp in the trailer for "Benny and Joon" is among the most famous single scenes ever shot on film.  Chaplin only has five titles in the Criterion Collection, so The Gold Rush, even in the narrated/music enhanced format- and by the way when I say "Music enhanced" I mean "flight of the bumblebee" used over and over and over again.

  The Gold Rush is a true classic of film: A work of art that has both maintained an Audience and critical esteem for over a century.  Surely that is a fair measure of a classic work of Art?  Audience and critical esteem fro 100+ years?  Using that standard, you don't really know until a 100 years have passed, but for The Gold Rush we are 12 years off from that point. 


The Great Dictator (1940) d. Charlie Chaplin (9/28/13)

Charlie Chaplin does his Hitler.



The Great Dictator (1940)
 d. Charlie Chaplin
Criterion Collection #565


  Really digging Charlie Chaplin right now, but unable to slip him into casual conversation.  Compare the contemporary relevance of Chaplin to another recent emphasis of mine, Russian movies.  I've used Russian movies in two different conversations in the last week and gotten good responses both times.  So Chaplin isn't very cool, but he is a genius.

  Like any artistic genius who controls his/her own means of production AND obtains positive critical, popular and financial response to his/her early work, Chaplin became obsessed with a passion project.  As the accompanying featurette by Chaplin archivist Cecilia Cenciarelli documents, Chaplin wanted to make a movie about Napoleon.  He spent close to a decade working on this proposed film of Napoleon in exile.  He had people doing research, he bought rights to a book on the subject, he paid to have a screenplay created.   The featurette uses excerpts from letters between Chaplin and his close associates that show he didn't really abandon the Napoleon in exile project until the mid to late 1930s.

  The Great Dictator was released in 1940, and it incorporates many of the characteristics of the unamde Napoleon movie.  Specifically, the central plot point of The Great Dictator: Chaplin playing both the Hitler character and a Jewish barber who looks exactly like the Hitler character.  Watching The Great Dictator for the first time, it was hard not to be shocked at Chaplin's aggressively political film.  Even with the funny included, The Great Dictator is a serious fucking movie.   The Chaplin Dictator character talks about exterminating the Jews repeatedly, as well as casually discussing murdering 3000 striking factory workers because he "doesn't want any of his worker to be unhappy."


  Even more amazing is that The Great Dictator came out before the U.S.entered into World War II.  As readers may or may not know, during the Jo McCarthy led Communist witch hunts after World War II, attacking Fascism BEFORE the US entered officially into World War II was called being a "premature anti-Fascist" and was grounds for being accused of being a closet Communist. The Great Dictator is the kind of bold film that could only have been produced and released by an Artist with complete control of his means of production.   It is quite an accomplishment, and an astonishing film, but in terms of film art itself vs. historical significance, it is a flawed masterpiece with a clunky 2 hour run time and dozens of cringe inducing moments.  Still worth seeing.

Solaris (1972) d. Andrei Tarkovsky (9/30/13)
  
The sentient ocean of Solaris.

Movie Review
Solaris (1972)
d. Andrei Tarkovsky
Criterion Collection #164


  Solaris (1972) was close to being next on the list by spine number, and then this week I read the Zola Jesus Top 10 feature at the Criterion Collection website, and she put Solaris at #2 and said:

Solaris is not just a movie to me. It feels like an entire language. The more I watch it, the more I learn about the genius of Tarkovsky’s vision. I still have yet to read the original story by Stanislaw Lem, but it’s next on my list to understanding the puzzle that is this wonderful film. (CRITERION COLLECTION TOP 10 FEATURE)

 That timely recommendation, plus the fact that the other Tarkovsky movie I watched (Andrei Rublev Criterion Collection #34) was KICK ASS, was enough to get me to watch.

  I knew going in that Solaris was slow, and that is "sci fi" and that there was a shitty American remake starring George Clooney, and that it was long.  It is a long, slow sci fi film, which, as the Criterion Collection site itself points out makes it "vastly different from what most Americans consider to be sci fi."  By which they presumably mean Star Wars and their ilk, but the obvious Western reference point is Stanley Kubrick's 2001- which was released in 1968.  As I recall 2001 is slow and boring in similar fashion.

  Solaris is also timely because of another upcoming film, Gravity:


  Gravity seems to be a more straight forward action picture, but shares some of the same ambiance.  And of course there is the NASA documentary For All Mankind- about the trips NASA took to the moon.  It's all kind of a metaphor about alienation from one's surroundings.  


No comments:

Blog Archive