Audiobook Review
The Great Transformation (1944)
by Karl Polyani
I keep coming across references to Hungarian economist/social theorist Karl Polyani. He was front and present in Capitalism by Sven Beckert, and I'd argue that Polyani is a huge influence on Beckert- I'm sure Beckert would agree so maybe not an opinion I'd have to argue. Polyani also got his own chapter in Capitalism and Its Critics by John Cassidy. I think it was while I was listening to Capitalism and Its Critics that I discovered that someone made an Audiobook edition of Polyani's opus, The Great Transformation. Clocking in at 14 hours, it was the attention commitment equivalent of a novel, and Polyani is light on the hard economics. The Great Transformation read almost like a magazine article at times, presumably this was his attempt to communicate his ideas to a larger audience. The timing though- yeesh- 1944- probably couldn't pick a worse time to publish a work of popular economics, what with the war on and all.
I'm sure it also didn't help his popularity that he had foreign origins and a critique that took direct aim at the concept of "lassez faire" economics popularized by the Austrian school (Von Mises, Friedman and his disciples). Polyani was unique in that he was a contemporary of Von Mises going back to his student days, and so was well prepared when American intellectuals began promulgating his ideas. Thirty years into a broad consensus about the basic mechanics of managing economic growth (spend your way out of a recession or demand crises, generally try not to let administrators throttle economic growth) it can be easy to forget how controversial some of these positions were a half century back.
The main thesis in this book is that capitalism created a "market society" that, far from requiring a "hands-off" approach from the state, is unfathomable WITHOUT the state intervening in a myriad of ways. His major illustration of this process was what happened with the Speenhamland system . This was an amplification of the Elizabethan poor laws from the 18th century. Basically, locals where required to offer everyone in their area a place to stay, food and a job. The growing middle class and budding capitalist class destroyed this system so that poor people would be forced to work for wages.
In an era where AI technologists have suggested that a "universal basic income" might be the solution to compensating people for AI created job loss, the comparison is as relevant now as it was in the mid 20th century (maybe more so?) Polyani's point with the Speenhamland system is both that it was government created and government destroyed. A free market in labor was not something which "existed in nature" and needed to be "protected from the leviathan," rather it was something that needed to be created by affirmative action at the behest of motivated, enfranchised interest groups. Hard to argue the point in 2026.
Instagram