Dedicated to classics and hits.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Social epistemology and the Sociology of Philosophy

Epistemology Map
Epistemology Map

      

            I'm not going to stop until I have zero readers. Wouldn't it be awesome if there was some blogger who said "I do have a readership, my goal is to drive that readership down to nothing." Not to like, stop posting, but rather to consciously make posts that he/she knows his/her readers aren't interested in, but which interest the writer.
             I'm reading a book called the Sociology of Philosophy by Randall Collins. It's v. interesting- but you do a background in the area of philosophy to understand what's happening. Not like, you need to be a graduate student in philosophy, but you need to know your general way around Greek, Chinese and Indian thinkers.
           Before I write another sentence about Philosophy, I wanted to recommend a book which I view as the single best summation of Western Philosophy in the 20th century (German, French and Anglo-American), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity by Jurgen Habermas (my fav philosopher as of the last time I read any philosophy- law school almost a decade ago.
     My feeling about western philosophy is that it's basically a failed project. No anyone who prefers philosophy to religion? Me neither.
         Anyway, in the Sociology of Philosophy Collins focuses on intellectual networks as they existed across generations and geographical space. He draws lots of charts to basically explicate his thesis: That intellectual ideas are spread by small groups of individuals, and that success of those ideas are only judged several generations after they have been created, which means that ultimate success goes down to how well your disciples "spread the gospel."
       In turn, individuals are motivated to become carriers of ideas because of conflicts that are generated by the originators of those ideas. It's the conflict of ideas which draws attention. Once the conflict is established, successive generations stake out their own positions over time. That's the "sociology of philosophy" in a nut shell mass or menos.

      Many call this field "social epistemology" which wiki defines as:

        a broad set of approaches to the study of knowledge, all of which construe human knowledge as a collective achievement. Social epistemologists may be found working in many of the disciplines of the humanities and social sciences, most commonly in philosophy and sociology.
        I'M IN!!!!!

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Book Review: Mesopotamia: Reason, Writing and the Gods by Jean Bottero

Sumerian/Akkadian figures
Sumerian/Akkadian figures

Books Discussed

History Begins at Sumer by Samuel Kramer
Mesopotamia: Reason, Writing and the Gods by Jean Bottero, translated by Zainab Banhrani and Marc Van De Mieroop

I think in terms of cheap hipster points, ancient Mesopotamia is under-developed. Who occupies the field? A couple of death metal bands and the Vice documentary film about contemporary heavy-metal Iraqi guys? It's fertile ground, simply because a) there is a lot of it b) it's really strange c) no one has heard of it. Meme gold.

However there are pot holes on the road to wisdom, and History Begins at Sumer, previously reviewed here, is one of them. What a boring book! I found it excruciating. History Begins at Sumer is the academic equivalent of a decades old Readers Digest: Dumbing it Down American Style. History Begins at Sumer is dated and not worth reading.

On the other hand, Bottero's Mesopotamia, published in 1995 by the University of Chicago, is literally a breath of fresh air, and is clearly aware of History Begins at Sumer's popularity, and basically mocks it, which is awesome, because he's right. Even though it is translated from the French, the simplicity and clarity of Bottero's argument is more akin to the Annalist movement of French history then the stinking wasteland of French cultural theory/philosophy.

Which all goes to say: READ BOTTERO'S BOOK AND NOT HISTORY BEGINS AT SUMER!!!

Monday, September 14, 2009

Minotaur///\\Labyrinth

Minotaur head
MINOTAUR


Labirinto amoroso
LABYRINTH


Theseus and the Minotaur
MINOTAUR


(MINOTAUR DOCUMENTARY)

Blog Archive